Free members get 1 monthly unlock. Join now to unlock this thread and see the full conversation.
The study is ME and my Wife and as I ALWAYS SAY....we are all N-of-1! Studies are utterly and totally worthless. They measure nothing but what happens in the people being studied. Which has ZERO CORRELATION to you or anyone else for that matter. If you beLIEve otherwise, you're allowing yourself to be lied to.
The only way you'll ever find out is if you use it yourself and see if you get similar results. You might and you might not!
Ok, I get that. What i was really looking for is your current opinion. Do you think tesofensine is as effective as any of the sub q peptides? Trying to glean from your experience and gain more perspective. I am trying to ask questions that might be of value to me and others...
Understood. The answer is the same and you ARE NOT asking questions that are valuble to anyone but yourself.
For the exact same reasons I previously explained.
Tesofensine is different than injectable peptides as it stimulates BDNF and enhances metabolic uncoupling over time.
It has nothing to do with helping to increase endogenous GH production.
I've written about all these things hundreds of times previously on my blog for free, my email list and now in The Peptides book.
One must be willing to do the work to find the answers.
k
